NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 25 Oct 2012 13:23:53 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (32 lines)
Hi,

It looks like a good start.

Getting some information on the deeper issues of the process discussions would be good.  It is good to know that you are talking about these issues, but what are the points being made?

I feel like we have gotten our toes wet on what it means to do public process, private data, but we need to see even more of the process.  I look forward to reading the monthly reports and hope they are substantive in details of the process discussions.

thanks

avri


On 25 Oct 2012, at 11:01, Rafik Dammak wrote:

> Hello everyone,
> 
> Earlier than expected, I am sharing with you update about nomcom. In the meeting last week, it was agreed that nomcom will produce a regular report card  about its activities and latest updates improving transparency and informing better the community Please find  the report card of toronto meeting attached to this email and of course any feedback is welcome!
> The nomcom website will be updated soon when th call for statement of interests will be open.
> 
> Best Regards,
> 
> Rafik
> 
> 
> -- 
> Rafik Dammak
> @rafik
> "fight for the users"
> 
> <2013 Open Leadership Positions.pdf><NomCom Report Card Oct 2012 Final r1.pdf>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2