NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Adam Peake <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Adam Peake <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 3 Jul 2013 16:26:16 +0900
Content-Type:
multipart/mixed
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (-1 MB) , calm-ICANN.png (-1 MB) , text/plain (-1 MB)




On Jul 3, 2013, at 4:13 PM, William Drake wrote: > On Jul 3, 2013, at 7:08 AM, Marc Perkel <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > >> Considering the NSA and PRISM stuff and that they are into Microsoft, Google, Apple, Facebook, etc - shouldn't we assume that ICANN has been compromised? Considering everything else they are into how can they not be into ICANN? >> >> Having said that - what does that mean to our trip? > > Maybe that we should have all worried less about having our computers compromised at the Beijing meeting? Or, worried more broadly...

ATOM RSS1 RSS2