Hi there,

I've made a few suggested edits in the attached version.  Just fleshed-out more on the issue of the Independent Objector and clarified that our support for the ALAC statement was support for the concerns raised by ALAC.  (As I recall, we diverged on the conclusion: ALAC said "don't go forward" and we said "fix it and go forward")  http://forum.icann.org/lists/5gtld-guide/msg00099.html

Thanks,
Robin







On Jan 10, 2011, at 11:44 AM, Konstantinos Komaitis wrote:

> Dear all,
> 
> Please see the email from Mary below regarding Recommendation 6 - Morality and Public order objections.
> 
> Best
> 
> KK
> 
> 
> --
> Dr. Konstantinos Komaitis,
> Lecturer in Law,
> NCUC Chair,
> University of Strathclyde,
> The Lord Hope Building,
> 141 St. James Road,
> Glasgow, G4 0LT,
> UK
> tel: +44 (0)141 548 4306
> email: [log in to unmask]
> http://www.komaitis.org
> Book: http://www.routledge.com/books/details/9780415477765/
> 
> ------ Forwarded Message
> From: Konstantinos Komaitis <[log in to unmask]>
> Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 19:35:32 +0000
> To: Mary Wong <[log in to unmask]>, <[log in to unmask]>, <[log in to unmask]>
> Conversation: [ncsg-policy] Draft NCSG comments to GNSO Council on Rec 6
> Subject: Re: [ncsg-policy] Draft NCSG comments to GNSO Council on Rec 6
> 
> 
> Dear Mary,
> 
> Thank you very much for taking the lead in drafting this statement. I have added a small bit on the 'incitement and instigation' section, seeking to clarify the importance of raising the bar of such objections. I am attaching the amended version and I fully support this statement.
> 
> Again thank you very much for drafting this.
> 
> Best
> 
> KK
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 10/01/2011 18:56, "Mary Wong" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> 
> Hello everyone,
> 
> As you may recall, NCSG members participated actively in the cross-community working group (CWG) that made certain recommendations regarding what was formerly termed the "morality & public order" objection process. At the Cartagena meeting, the ICANN Board and the GNSO Council requested further clarity and comment from the CWG and each Stakeholder Group (SG), respectively.
> 
> The CWG has since submitted its response to the Board, and the Council is due to consider comments from SGs shortly. As such, attached is a rough attempt at providing the Council with the requested input.
> 
> I apologize for the short notice, but as the next Council meeting is scheduled for 13 January, I'd appreciate any major changes or indications of non-support be sent to the list as soon as possible, e.g. within the next 24 hours.
> 
> Thanks and cheers
> Mary
> 
> 
> Mary W S Wong
> Professor of Law
> Chair, Graduate IP Programs
> UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SCHOOL OF LAW Two White Street Concord, NH 03301 USA Email: [log in to unmask] Phone: 1-603-513-5143 Webpage: http://www.law.unh.edu/marywong/index.php Selected writings available on the Social Science Research Network (SSRN) at: http://ssrn.com/author=437584
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> As of August 30, 2010, Franklin Pierce Law  Center has affiliated with the University of New Hampshire and is now  known as the University of  New Hampshire School of Law. Please  note that all email addresses have changed and now follow the  convention: [log in to unmask] For more information on the University  of New Hampshire School of Law, please  visit law.unh.edu <http://law.unh.edu>
> 
> 
> ------ End of Forwarded Message
> <NCSG COMMENTS TO THE GNSO COUNCIL ON THE RECOMMENDATION 6 CROSS.DOCX>




IP JUSTICE
Robin Gross, Executive Director
1192 Haight Street, San Francisco, CA  94117  USA
p: +1-415-553-6261    f: +1-415-462-6451
w: http://www.ipjustice.org     e: [log in to unmask]