On 24-Mar-14 14:26, Carlos A. Afonso wrote:
>
> I think this contribution is reasonably compatible with what NCSG is
> proposing. Of course we do not agree to any operational entity run by
> registries to take over IANA, but we believe there may be a structure
> similar to NRO as described above which could run the other IANA
> functions under a similar relationship with ICANN.


It also sounds like it would be compatible with the structure I suggest 
in my NetMundial offering 
<http://avri.doria.org/post/78863643474/one-possible-roadmap-for-iana-evolution> 
for an IANA Stewardship Group (ISG) that is made up of the clients of 
IANA, Root Zone Operators and other stakeholders.

The pattern I suggest is that the ISG be an independent body under the 
ICANN umbrella, much as as the IAB is an independent body under ISOC. 
and that this body serve as the initial oversight body of the IANA 
function and Root Zone Management.

avri