NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Amr Elsadr <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Amr Elsadr <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 13 Nov 2013 22:14:29 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (28 lines)
Hi,

As far as the Policy Committee is concerned, I agree with Avri. I would also prefer to hear from at least one person from NPOC before the statement is sent as an NCSG statement.

Thanks.

Amr

On Nov 13, 2013, at 9:53 PM, Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> 
> On 13 Nov 2013, at 15:09, Kathy Kleiman wrote:
> 
>> 
>> Avri, what would like as the process to finalize?  Are we OK to submit since these have been in circulation awhile and up for discussion and review?
> 
> 
> Well Milton had a few issues and I was hoping that he would indicate whether his issue had been resolved.
> 
> Also, for the Policy committee to submit something, normally want hear at least one voice from each constituency if possible.  
> 
> avri
> 
> _______________________________________________
> PC-NCSG mailing list
> [log in to unmask]
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg

ATOM RSS1 RSS2