NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Slides on NCUC response to GNSO Reform
From:
Milton L Mueller <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Milton L Mueller <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 28 Jun 2007 19:35:12 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines) 
>can you explain what this means (last slide)?
>
>ALAC and the GNSO and beyond…
>- Retain separate role for At Large
>- All-ICANN, not just domain names <=== ???

Sorry, didn't see this. 
The short answer is that ALAC policy input is supposed to encompass all matters of ICANN, including address allocation and whatever other issues it gets into, whereas the remit of the GNSO -- and NCUC, which is a constituency of GNSO -- pertains _only_ to domain name policy. 



No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.9.9/870 - Release Date: 6/26/2007 10:07 AM
 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2