NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Kathy Kleiman <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Kathy Kleiman <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 19 Oct 2016 12:05:21 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (29 lines)
The Whois Complaint process and why anonymous people can ask for 
personal information about registrants, but ICANN never investigates 
whether these allegations are intended to harass, intimidate or for 
anti-competitive reasons.

On 10/19/2016 11:29 AM, Mueller, Milton L wrote:
> 1. The new "complaint" system, which puts ICANN's lawyer (whose job is to protect the corporation from complainers whether they are right or wrong) in charge of managing complaints. Also affects the independence of the Ombudsman in unclear ways
>
> 2. The "small group" that is trying to develop policy for IGO names outside of ICANN's bottom up and representative policy processes.
>
> 3. Why there were no repercussions for the abuses of TLD evaluation procedures in the Dot Registry case. Indeed, the person responsible seems to have been promoted.
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: NCSG-Discuss [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf
>> Of Tapani Tarvainen
>> Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2016 8:30 AM
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: Topics for meeting with the board in Hyderabad?
>>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> As usual the board wants in advance topics or questions for our meeting with
>> them in Hyderabad.
>>
>> Suggestions?
>>
>> --
>> Tapani Tarvainen

ATOM RSS1 RSS2