NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
David Cake <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
David Cake <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 25 Jan 2010 12:36:38 +0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines)
At 12:24 PM +0100 23/1/10, Avri Doria wrote:
>hi,
>
>at the cost of getting vilified for supporting elitism or drinking 
>koolaid, when working with companies and governments, sometimes the 
>people are more liberal and more willing to work on compromise then 
>their bosses.  if everything is open, they risk getting fired or in 
>the case of some governments a lot worse.
>
>If you want to work with people who have something to lose by being 
>too open it is sometimes beneficial to the final result to give them 
>the freedom of expression that Chatham house rules allow.
>

	This has also been my experience. Particularly when working 
with law enforcement etc.
	Regards
		David

ATOM RSS1 RSS2