NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Tapani Tarvainen <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Tapani Tarvainen <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 7 Mar 2017 20:25:13 +0200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (80 lines)
Not seeing too many questions, how about something different:

NCPH is in the process of selecting its Board member.
What advice would you give us in what to look for in a candidate?

I'd be kind of curious to see what they'd say to that...

Tapani

On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 04:43:14PM +0200, Tapani Tarvainen ([log in to unmask]) wrote:

> Sounds like we'll only have one question for the board...
> 
> Kathy, can you have publishable phrasing for it today?
> 
> Anybody else, if you have other questions to suggest, please
> let us know TODAY. Thanks.
> 
> Tapani
> 
> 
> On Mar 02 10:55, Kathy Kleiman ([log in to unmask]) wrote:
> 
> > Tapani,
> > 
> > These are questions for the Board/NCSG Meeting, right?   I think we
> > should be asking questions about Compliance -- and continue our
> > efforts to seek fairer compliance actions for registrants,
> > compliance actions that fall within the scope of ICANN, and
> > compliance actions responsive to the needs of the whole community
> > (not a subset).
> > 
> > This is definitely not the right phrasing yet, but we can certain
> > provide it. I know Ayden and Raoul have been thinking about
> > compliance. Would anyone else like to help craft a question for the
> > board? (Please respond privately.)
> > 
> > Best, Kathy
> > 
> > On 3/2/2017 8:05 AM, Tapani Tarvainen wrote:
> > >Dear all,
> > >
> > >As time is running short, I'll take the liberty of hijacking
> > >Farzaneh's message from NCUC list - thank you.
> > >
> > >So, questions below for all NCSG members. The deadline is rather
> > >impossible, but I don't expect sky to fall if we extend it by
> > >the weekend. Nonetheless quick comments would be appreciated.
> > >
> > >Tapani
> > >
> > >On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 07:57:57AM -0500, farzaneh badii ([log in to unmask]) wrote:
> > >
> > >>NCUC members,
> > >>
> > >>Board has requested to answer the below questions for its meeting with the
> > >>stakeholder groups ( I think NCSG):
> > >>
> > >>1. To what degree is your membership actively participating in
> > >>CCWG-Accountability Work Stream 2?  What could the Board or ICANN
> > >>organization do to facilitate participation and timely completion of this
> > >>work?
> > >>2. What policy/advice issues are top priorities for your group?
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>They also want to know what we want to ask them during NCSG/Board meeting.
> > >>
> > >>This meeting will take place at the NCSG level but I took the liberty to
> > >>ask you and trigger the discussion. If discussions take place on NCSG about
> > >>these questions and our questions to the Board, then we shall transfer our
> > >>input to that thread.
> > >>
> > >>Board has generously given us a deadline of 3 March for submitting our
> > >>questions!
> > >>
> > >>Best
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>Farzaneh

ATOM RSS1 RSS2