NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Date:
Mon, 18 Mar 2013 16:35:58 +1300
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (61 lines)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi Maria - it's an interesting thought.
I wonder, as the IO's "list" came from the scope he was given in the
new applicant guidebook - presumably this was the result of some
community discussion and agreement as it was developed about what
"public interest" objections might cover. So perhaps start there as a
minimum - but there may have been NCUC submissions on the point that
were wider in scope, perhaps check the www.ncuc.org webpage?
Happy to help with ideas on this
Joy




On 16/03/2013 5:18 a.m., Maria Farrell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Following this week's NCSG policy call, wherein I kind of dumped
> Wendy in it for yet another drafting job ... I am putting together
> a rough draft of points we might include in a list of 'what are the
> actual public interest principles that should be used in
> policy/decision-making at ICANN?'.
> 
> I'm going through the Independent Objector's recent writings, and 
> started off with Wendy's laundry list of " due process, human
> rights, representation and participation". And I'll take the
> opportunity to remind myself of the relevant parts of the bylaws.
> 
> So that's a good start.
> 
> I think there should also be something about the openness of the 
> Internet, the end to end principle (though more in the generic
> and, ahem, principled sense than in the strict sense of network 
> architecture), including universal resolvability & global
> interoperability.
> 
> I'm suddenly finding it hard to articulate this, even though it's
> the reason I joined ICANN in the first place. I mean the almost
> aesthetic - but deeply political - way that ICANN is supposed to be
> part of an Internet built on an open architecture. Finer minds have
> expressed this better but I am stumped to remember where. Does
> anyone have any suggestions?
> 
> (Milton, I am looking at you.)
> 
> Maria
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJRRoueAAoJEA9zUGgfM+bqxEsIAJ2WXBBauVrS6oS5NQLGwnqw
kzlXaqiXuHvogm4OS9nG6qx8ing4w8VrrFRisLZpgmbgnVOiRfcRglHjVdFP+62p
0ZUZxwGhtiLTxuRPbYvMjuV+9JkiLzm2VvPTJaDQsTYrSxGdzLAiTODcizbLfD4k
f+Z7qjsUwWG6fNuZ2GlZPFrMKCEPtD3aomy8yMWxqs2r6kSL4X/TvaYKsK2sjJYV
bGVL4JMboSrBuIBApzfmnN9HmvGsggI1LJzpT/e5D3CoVhDtIrgPNFVkjOR7Xz0b
bcRnuyXbKCaH3S5iIHese0/peAQ4WlBAS79MCZ8AH//ecZLFQBwnYDaJzuOpnMQ=
=/Lyp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

ATOM RSS1 RSS2