NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
William Drake <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
William Drake <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 13 Jun 2010 20:07:00 +0200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
On Jun 13, 2010, at 7:31 PM, Wendy Seltzer wrote:

> Carlos A. Afonso wrote:
>> Yes -- the 215 votes in favor represent more than 68% of the total
>> possible votes (recalling that each voter could have one, two or four
>> votes). The complete voters list had a possible total of 315 votes.
>> 
> 
> Thanks Carlos!
> 
> Great participation and great news for NCSG that we've been able to
> achieve this milestone.  

Indeed

> I hope these will help us to convince the Bpard
> that it's time to let NCSG move forward as a community.

But first, they'll be hiring Deloitte & Touche to handle the the verification, for the nominal fee of $3 million.  We can all expect a phone call.  If a recount is deemed necessary, machines from Diebold shall be used. 

Just kidding (I hope)

Cheers

Bill

ATOM RSS1 RSS2