Of course not. But I do not believe we have any organisations who focus on that area as their policy concern. Nor have any individuals identified that as a policy area they focus on. So if we do, it is their business, and not ours, until they choose to make it relevant. 

Regards

	David
On 04/02/2013, at 1:13 PM, Marc Perkel <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> 
> On 2/3/2013 8:59 PM, David Cake wrote:
>> I have friends who run sex worker activism NGOs (including one that is sex worker run by charter). Next time I see them I'll ask if they want to join NCUC. I think they'd be perfectly welcome here, and would fit in, but I'm not sure how much of a policy priority       ICANN issues might be for them (but hey, .xxx, IFFOR, legal restrictions on advertising in some jurisdictions, etc - maybe they do have enough to justify their participation, I don't know). 
>> 
>> 
> 
> Are you sure there aren't any sex workers already on NCUC?
>