NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Date:
Fri, 18 Mar 2016 10:19:47 +0000
Content-Type:
multipart/signed
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1228 bytes) , signature.asc (504 bytes)
+1

Desiree
--
On 18 Mar 2016, at 09:05, Wendy Seltzer <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> I support endorsing the IAB comment.
> 
> --Wendy
> 
> On 03/17/2016 01:53 PM, Marilia Maciel wrote:
>> Hi James, thanks for the clarifications you provided.
>> 
>> Based on this information and considering the little time we have, the
>> question seems to be: should NCSG endorse IAB's comment on RDAP? It would
>> be great if our members, specially those in our policy committee, could
>> share their views on the next hours.
>> 
>> Thanks!
>> Marília
>> 
>> 
>> On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 5:24 AM, Shane Kerr <[log in to unmask]>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> All,
>>> 
>>> At 2016-03-17 09:22:34 +0100
>>> Shane Kerr <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> I'm not sure the NCUC necessarily needs to have an opinion about the
>>>> technology itself, and can happily wait and weigh in on the parts that
>>>> matter to us.
>>> 
>>> Of course I meant NCSG. I blame decaffeinated coffee.
>>> 
>>> Cheers,
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Shane
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>> [log in to unmask]
>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>> 
> 
> 
> --
> Wendy Seltzer -- [log in to unmask]



ATOM RSS1 RSS2