Hi,

In what way do you agree with Rudy?

That we should change the rules in the Charter about how we do things?

If you want to change the charter that is fine - there is a process for
doing that - collect the signatures and get a vote.  Otherwise the
charter ought to stand and rules changes to change to advantage one
person should be avoided at all costs.

In the meantime, please tell us what your candidate has done in ICANN to
merit our votes as opposed to trying to bully us into undemocratic
modalities.  convince us he is the better candidate - don't threaten us
with rules of convenience.

avri



On 25-Jun-14 16:17, Martin Pablo Silva Valent wrote:
> I agree with rudy.
> 
> Cheers,  Martin.
> 
> On Jun 25, 2014 9:37 AM, "Avri Doria" <[log in to unmask]
> <mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:
> 
>     Hi,
> 
>     This is being discussed on the NCSG Policy list, but I think it ought to
>     also be discussed here.
> 
>     I have nominated Milton, my long time argument foil (we disagree as much
>     as we agree) - and friend for the role on the IANA Transition
>     Coordination group.
> 
>     I cannot think of anyone else who
> 
>     - better understands the issue
>     - better understands the needs of the NCSG
>     - who has greater influence in this area
>     - or who has been more dedicated for as long to non commercial causes at
>     ICANN
> 
>     I hope he gets the support of our membership so that the PC feels able
>     to pick him for the role.
> 
>     avri
>