NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Johan Helsingius <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Johan Helsingius <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 3 Nov 2023 14:16:46 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (53 lines)
I would suggest volunteers / candidates describe their familiarity with
Organizational Reviews and knowledge of continuous improvement work
outside of ICANN.

	Julf


On 02/11/2023 20:28, Tomslin Samme-Nlar wrote:
> Dear members,
> 
> The Continuous Improvement Program Community Coordination Group 
> (CIP-CCG) terms of reference calls for each SO, AC, GNSO Stakeholder 
> Group, and Regional At-Large Organization (RALO) to appoint one (1) 
> representative to the Group.
> 
> Regarding the representative, the ToR recommends the following 
> skill/expertise:
> 
> "*It will be useful to have some representatives with familiarity with 
> Organizational Reviews, but also representatives with knowledge of 
> continuous improvement work outside of ICANN; those that can contribute 
> new and innovative ideas for improving the effectiveness and the 
> accountability of the different ICANN structures*."
> If anyone would like to volunteer, please let me know by Tuesday 7th 
> November for the PC to evaluate.
> 
> _*More info on CIP-CCG:*_
> 
> The Third Accountability and Transparency Review (ATRT3) Recommendation 
> 3.6 calls for Organizational Reviews to be evolved into a Continuous 
> Improvement Program (CIP). The recommendation to create a Continuous 
> Improvement Program states that ICANN org shall work with each 
> Supporting Organization (SO), Advisory Committee (AC) and their 
> stakeholder groups, and the Nominating Committee (NomCom) to establish a 
> Continuous Improvement Program. It will include an annual satisfaction 
> survey of members/participants, and a regular assessment, including a 
> summary of continuous improvements published at least every three years.
> 
> As the ICANN Community considers the implementation of ATRT3 
> Recommendation 3.6 as it relates to each community structure and for the 
> ICANN Community overall, the CIP Community Coordination Group is 
> intended to serve as a forum to exchange best practices, lessons 
> learned, as well as for sharing information and progress related to 
> already existing community continuous improvement activities. The 
> representatives in the CIP-CCG will share best practices and collaborate 
> on community-wide implementation of ATRT3 Recommendation 3.6, while 
> relaying information back to their constituencies to inform the process 
> and voice decisions.
> 
> Warmly,
> Tomslin
> 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2