NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Wendy Seltzer <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Wendy Seltzer <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 21 Jul 2010 11:18:13 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (33 lines)
Thanks Avri.

Group, what procedures do we want to follow for submitting comments, 
especially for those due today on DAG4 (where we have several distinct 
segments)?  Should we each submit what we've written individually, and 
follow up with NCSG endorsement if the policy council approves? (as Avri 
suggested in response to another thread)

--Wendy

On 07/21/2010 11:08 AM, Avri Doria wrote:
> hi,
>
> just did a quick update of the comment list on the wiki
>
> https://st.icann.org/ncsg-ec/index.cgi?comment_periods_and_volunteers
>
> noticed a lot of things were ending today.  tough there have been a few extensions in general.
>
>
> a.
>
>


-- 
Wendy Seltzer -- [log in to unmask]
Fellow, Silicon Flatirons Center at University of Colorado Law School
Fellow, Berkman Center for Internet & Society at Harvard University
http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/seltzer.html
http://www.chillingeffects.org/
https://www.torproject.org/

ATOM RSS1 RSS2