NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Nicolas Adam <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Nicolas Adam <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 10 May 2011 20:32:22 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (15 lines)
I agree.

Nicolas

On 5/10/2011 7:55 PM, Andrew A. Adams wrote:
> This is the sort of attempt at reverse domain name hijacking that we need to
> be pressing ICANN to deal with:
(...)
> eco-labs.org is fighting the request and has taken suitable legal advice on
> dealing with this, but the lack of grounds for a claim strike me as one of
> the big problems with UDRP at present. There seems to be no requirement to
> present a prima facie case for bringing a UDRP request, and forcing a
> non-commercial user to take expensive legal advice and waste their time
> dealing with such spurious reverse domain name hijacking attempts.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2