NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Andrew A. Adams" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Andrew A. Adams
Date:
Thu, 11 Oct 2012 12:42:10 +0900
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines)
ICANN's Silo model indeed produces a problem for this group. I think what 
they really need to do is split themselves for the purposes of ICANN formal 
structures into two groups: "non-profit Public Internet Access" and 
"Cyber-cafes and other commercial shared computer access providers", apply 
for NCSG/CSG group membership but agree amongst themselves that they will 
coordinate strongly between them on promoting the clear common interests such 
a group has.

I'm afraid I could not support the inclusion of for-profit access providers 
in an NCSG constituency as it violates the non-commercial principle of SG 
membership.

-- 
Professor Andrew A Adams                      [log in to unmask]
Professor at Graduate School of Business Administration,  and
Deputy Director of the Centre for Business Information Ethics
Meiji University, Tokyo, Japan       http://www.a-cubed.info/

ATOM RSS1 RSS2