NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Robin Gross <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Fri, 23 Feb 2007 13:10:09 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (29 lines)
Good question.  The law in each of those national jurisdictions will be 
relevant.  So rather than all 240 country restrictions to be followed 
for all, only the law of the county(ies) in which it is registered 
(meaning registrant, and registry/registrar).  So, for example, 
registries and registries physically located in Egypt follow Egyptian 
law restrictions.  And restrictions under Egyptian law would also 
observed for a registration of an applicant in Egypt - even by a foreign 
registrar.  And that foreign registrar country's law is also relevant.  
So at most the restrictions of 3 countries would be relevant - instead 
of all 240 countries' restrictions.

Thanks,
Robin



Horacio T. Cadiz wrote:

> Great work Robin.
> I have a question on the following:
>
> "v.  The string should not be illegal in the country in which it is 
> registered (i.e. national law applies)."
>
>   Does "the country in which it is registered" refer to the country of 
> the registrant,registry or the registrar?
>
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2