NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Mueller, Milton L" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Mueller, Milton L
Date:
Fri, 4 Sep 2015 17:45:26 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (60 lines)
Is there any way to word it that would change your dissent, or is the objection generic? 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Rosenzweig [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Friday, September 4, 2015 1:39 PM
> To: Mueller, Milton L; [log in to unmask]
> Cc: 'Schaefer, Brett'
> Subject: RE: CCWG comments last call
> 
> Milton/Colleagues
> 
> I think that the draft is quite fine and for the main I agree with it.
> Without in any way seeking to relitigate the issue, however, I know that the
> human rights language is one from which Heritage would dissent.  Is there
> some way of generically  making clear that the NCSG comments do not
> reflect the agreement of all NCSG members?
> 
> Paul
> 
> Paul Rosenzweig
> [log in to unmask]
> O: +1 (202) 547-0660
> M: +1 (202) 329-9650
> VOIP: +1 (202) 738-1739
> Skype: paul.rosenzweig1066
> Link to my PGP Key
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mueller, Milton L [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Friday, September 4, 2015 12:43 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: CCWG comments last call
> 
> I have made some revisions. We seem to have rough consensus that we are
> opposed to the proposed voting allocations and consider them and two
> other
> things serious enough to raise doubts about whether the CCWG-
> Accountability
> proposal enhances ICANN's accountability. The comments now note that we
> are
> not unanimous on this but do have a preponderance of opinion that would
> constitute rough consensus. We all seem to be in agreement about our
> discussion of the so-called "freedom to contract" section and the section on
> advice from public authorities. We also now seem to have a way forward on
> how to handle the HR commitment, though that has only been floated a few
> minutes ago so it needs more review.
> 
> In reviewing these comments, please refrain from the temptation to
> introduce
> minor wordsmithing - we really don't have time for it at this point.
> 
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1JGBXO5oOiN_FxivPFkHjz3Gc2w3AT2
> PeJznrXPw2
> fJ4/edit
> 
> Dr. Milton L Mueller
> Professor, School of Public Policy
> Georgia Institute of Technology

ATOM RSS1 RSS2