Hi,

> On Nov 23, 2016, at 1:49 PM, Group CEO-Vaibhav Aggarwal <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> 
> In my opinion, it is the decision of the EC especially the Chair on this. I must point out that The tone and Tanner used (James) is not right.

I don’t agree, and see nothing wrong with the “tone and Tanner” used by James.

> The whole idea of the EC is to vest trust in them to taken decisions for the rest of the members.

I disagree again. All EC members are accountable to the NCSG members in both their decisions and processes used to make them. NCSG members have an obligation to raise questions and/or concerns when they have them.

> Appologies in advance if I am being direct.

Speaking for myself, no apologies needed. I appreciate directness. Spares me the trouble of having to second-guess what someone is saying. :)

Thanks.

Amr