NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Desiree Miloshevic <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Desiree Miloshevic <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 9 Jun 2010 17:13:15 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (113 lines)
Apologies for not being able to join you!

Desiree
--

On 7 Jun 2010, at 12:30, Avri Doria wrote:

> Hi,
>
> We will be holding our final pre-Brussels phone call on Wednesday 9  
> June at 21 UTC <http://ncdnhc.org/events/ncsg-policy-meeting-9- 
> june>  .
>
> The draft Agenda:
>
> A.  Followup on actions from previous meeting
>
> ---
>
> B. Issues for GNSO meeting.
>
> https://st.icann.org/gnso-council/index.cgi?proposed_agenda_10_june_2010
>
> Item 2: Prioritization of GNSO work
>
> Item 3: GNSO AoC DT Endorsement Process
>
>
> Item 4: Implementation of New gTLD Recommendation 2
>
> Item 5: AGP Policy questions
>
> 5.4 Discussion of questions raised by Craig Schwartz in the 21 April  
> Council meeting (continued from 20 May)
>
> • Should the Council consider modifying the AGP Limits Policy to no  
> longer require semi-annual updates?
> • Should the Council consider modifying the AGP Limits Policy by  
> defining the terms “extraordinary circumstances” or “reoccur  
> regularly? For example:
>
> o Should instances of consumer fraud automatically be a legitimate  
> use of AGP deletes?
> o If a registrar proactively takes down (i.e., deletes) domains that  
> are known to propagate a fraudulent activity such as phishing,  
> should the registrar bear the cost if the deletions cause the  
> registrar to exceed the threshold defined in the Policy?
>
> Item 6: Whois Studies
>
> 6.1 Refer to:
>
> • Whois Studies Report: http://gnso.icann.org/issues/whois/whois-studies-report-for-gnso-23mar10-en.pdf
>
> • RFP for Proxy/Abuse Study: http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-2-18may10-en.htm
>
> • ICANN's FY11 Draft Operating Plan and Budget:
>
> http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/#op-budget-fy2011 (Note:  
> Public comment period is open until 25 June; the amount in the Draft  
> Budget for Whois Studies is at least $ 400,000.)
>
> 6.2 Procedure for deciding which study(studies) to initiate
>
> • Brief overview of the study choices (Liz Gasster)
>
>
> Item 7: GNSO Improvements OSC Recommendations from the CCT
>
> http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/cct-consolidated-report-final-09apr10-en.pdf
>
> • Public comments:
>
> http://forum.icann.org/lists/cct-recommendations/
>
> • Public comment summary & analysis:
>
> http://forum.icann.org/lists/cct-recommendations/msg00004.html
>
> Item 8: Other Business
>
> Note: I would like to ask the meeting whether there is support for  
> asking our NCSG council members to request that all GNSO council  
> telephone meetings be audiocast
>
> ---
>
> C. Update on WG/Wt efforts
>
> I ask that any NCSG members participating in WG/WT be ready to give  
> an update on what is going on in those groups
>
> Note; I have started a wiki page of WG/WT activities.  This is very  
> incomplete - in fact it is mostly empty.  I also include the names  
> of people involved in the various efforts that is also very  
> incomplete. Please let me know of any edits I should make.
>
> https://st.icann.org/ncsg-ec/index.cgi?ncsg_policy_issues
>
> ---
>
> D. NCSG updates
>
> - election
> - wiki
> -
>
> ---
>
> E. Planning for Brussles
>
> F.  Other

ATOM RSS1 RSS2