NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Milton L Mueller <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Milton L Mueller <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 22 Jul 2010 05:59:24 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
Avri, 
sorry to respond slowly, was traveling all day Tuesday 
I am part of NCSG and I am a big supporter of SRSU. 
Did you phrase the statement below correctly? Are you arguing that NCSG members have NO interest in SRSU or the opposite? 

________________________________________
From: NCSG-NCUC [[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Avri Doria [[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2010 10:56 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [NCSG-NCUC-DISCUSS] Single Registrant TLD

Hi,

Just checking.

The contention by some on the VIWG has been that I am deluded when I argue that the NCSG, especially some of its institutional members have no interest in seeing Single Registrant TLD (.ngo for want of a better name) where the names could be distributed internally, without use of a registrar, to employees or members.

Can anyone confirm my delusion?  Are their institutional members who think this sort of thing should exist - even if their name in not a famous brand?

thanks

a.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2