NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Date:
Sun, 23 Mar 2014 13:47:01 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (36 lines)
It is a perfectly reasonable statement IMO.

On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 12:44 PM, Rafik Dammak <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> just to clarify about this statement as NCSG comment on IANA transition:
> - we had the PC meeting today and discussed about the statement as was
> requested. we made some changes suggested during the meeting.
> - this version was circulated  by Milton to the NCSG list with 24 hours for
> comments.
> - after that I will send it on behalf of NCSG to the concerned parties.
> hope that is much more clear.
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Rafik
>
>
> 2014-03-23 17:51 GMT+09:00 Milton L Mueller <[log in to unmask]>:
>>
>> Visible here:
>>
>>
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sJ0Fo_4LalYbyRuq4B3X5uf7TySIDq9Mrb3UVByoXIg/edit?usp=sharing
>
>



-- 
Cheers,

McTim
"A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A
route indicates how we get there."  Jon Postel

ATOM RSS1 RSS2