NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Dan Krimm <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Dan Krimm <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 3 Aug 2010 21:17:55 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (33 lines)
Brilliant.  I'm definitely going to steal that.  Sort of like the
"refudiation" of crowdsourcing.

Systematically-manipulated (or systematically "refudiated") public opinion
polls can also be (and often are) used for crowdstamping, by the way.  It's
not just a feature of open-comment processes, but can be applied as a
variant where public opinion is manufactured artificially.  This is a
technique that goes all the way back to high school.

"Everyone" says so!  The People have spoken!  :-)

Thanks,
Dan


--
Any opinions expressed in this message are those of the author alone and do
not necessarily reflect any position of the author's employer.



At 11:53 AM +0800 8/4/10, David Cake wrote:
>	A useful neologism for ICANN processes (via Lillian Edwards
>twitter feed)
>Crowdstamping - going through the motions in asking the public about
>a policy but rubberstamping it anyway.
>	(term apparently coined by Uk web developer Stef Lewandowski
>in reponse to UK government consultation that, in response to 9,500
>public submissions,resulted in every responding government dept
>uniformly saying they should keep doing exactly what they were doing)
>	Regards
>		David

ATOM RSS1 RSS2