NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Kleinwächter, Wolfgang" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
"Kleinwächter, Wolfgang" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 22 Oct 2017 10:42:47 +0200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (28 lines)
1++ to Bill
 
Wolfgang
 
 

________________________________

From: NCSG-Discuss on behalf of William Drake
Sent: Sun 10/22/2017 8:52 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [NCSG-Discuss] Sally Costerton serving as ICANN SVP while actively soliciting and servicing unknown clients


Hi 


	On Oct 22, 2017, at 01:22, Salanieta Tamanikaiwaimaro <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

	I am just saying that we should be cautious and exercise care before we insinuate sinister behaviour on the part of Ms Sally Costerton.


FWIW I am very uncomfortable with this thread and its title. Lobbing public allegations with the implication of 'case proven' against a person, even if they are mere senior staff, before there's been due process and a reply from her and a finding of some sort seems inappropriate.  I am also unclear why the singular responsibility for engaging in this falls to NCSG, how did we become the community's watchdog?  Industry members are all over Xavier already on all matters budgetary etc.

There must be a better way to handle this issue than rushing into the street with torches and pitchforks.  John Poole has raised the issue, a process will ensue, why don't we wait and see what comes out of it and in the meanwhile focus on issues of direct relevance to noncommercial stakeholders?

Bill

ATOM RSS1 RSS2