NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Milton Mueller <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Milton Mueller <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 9 Feb 2004 10:05:09 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (34 lines)
>>> Erick Iriarte Ahon <[log in to unmask]> 02/08/04 08:48PM >>>
>I think milton speaks about "different" funds

No.

>and now the question is: are the funds to Rome Meeting 
>part of the $7000 US that milton said in his december 6 email??

Yes, of course.

Erick, all of the money we are working with was
discussed openly by the EC and announced in the Dec. 7 
minutes. The money is allocated by the Executive Committee, 
which is based on regional representation. It should be a
cause for optimism that the NCUC can actually plan two or
three months in advance, don't you think? 

In discussing this issue the EC prioritizes the funding
in the following way:

Top priority: GNSO Council members
Second priority: EC and Task Force members
Third priority: members, esp. from unrepresented regions

In other words, if a person has been elected to a
position to represent NCUC they need to be at the meetings, 
and if they are working on some GNSO Task Force
they may also need to be at meetings. 

Iliya is working on additional guidelines and I encourage
members to provide him with any input. 

--MM

ATOM RSS1 RSS2