NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 19 Mar 2010 09:21:25 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
On 19 Mar 2010, at 07:53, Avri Doria wrote:

> You will also find some discussion in the proposed registry contract section 2.9:
> http://www.icann.org/en/topics/new-gtlds/draft-agreement-specs-clean-04oct09-en.pdf
> 
> (BTW: I have been told that this is worth reviewing for lots of reasons - and that those among us who are contract savvy could find lots f things to comment on in this document)


Speaking of which, the conditions for amending a new gtld registry contract is currently open for comment.

One of the issues is that there is a push among registries to make it more like the RAA where the amendments have to be negotiated with each individual registry as opposed to being done through a common process like the consensus policy process.

Might be worth commenting on.

Info on the review process can be found at: http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/#agreement-amendment
Comment periods ends on 1 April.

cheers,

a.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2