NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Danny Younger <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Danny Younger <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 5 Sep 2006 05:43:11 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines)
Re:  "VeriSign would no longer be entitled to claim
that it should own the transliterations of the .com in
the other language strings, especially those spoken by
huge populations"

VeriSign is not the only organization claiming such
entitlement.  Please see the PIR document "Principles
for the Foundation of Top Level IDNs" that puts
forward similar arguments.  PIR has cited brand
fragmentation, security and stability issues,
registrar disenfranchisement, regulatory burdens,
intellectual property concerns and internet
fragmentation worries in defense of their view with
respect to managing all .org IDN transliterations.

http://www.icann.org/topics/idn/pir-idn-principles-23jun06.pdf

Was this document discussed in Amsterdam?

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2