Hi,

> On Aug 23, 2016, at 8:19 PM, Tapani Tarvainen <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> 

[SNIP]

> Some people would like to change the ballot mid-election.
> 
> An appeal has been filed and will be processed in due course as
> described in our charter.
> 
> But that is no reason to stop the election now.
> 
> Just vote.
> 

I find this to be extremely disappointing, especially knowing that I have already voted, and I have no intention of changing my vote because someone says I have to.

My problem right now is that I've voted for two of the three councillors, as well as NOTA. If I understand the current process correctly, this means my vote for those two councillors will be invalid.

Since this seems to be the case, and we can only vote against the councillors as a slate, not individually, I wonder why the ballot allows us to choose councillors “and” NOTA, instead of councillors “or” NOTA?

I normally wouldn’t share my voting choices on a public list, but believe that  under the current procedures, my ballot/vote does not now represent my actual choices.

Thanks.

Amr