NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
SPAM PLEASE IGNORE [Re: RFC 7704 seems vague and rambling, the Geek Feminism wiki seems clear and direct (was Public Comments - Revisions to ICANN Expected Standards of Behaviors)\
From:
Shane Kerr <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Shane Kerr <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 23 Mar 2017 10:48:50 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (28 lines) 
All,

Please ignore this mail. It was re-sent from a very old draft because I
am a muppet and don't know how to e-mail. :(

At 2016-06-06 11:39:45 +0800
Shane Kerr <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Avri,
> 
> At 2016-06-01 13:24:39 -0400
> avri doria <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> 
> > On 31-May-16 15:58, Mueller, Milton L wrote:
> > > From what I can read, I would not support the proposed policy.   
> > 
> > I find myself agreeing with the comment that we will eventually need
> > something more.
> > And I think that RFC7704 is a good model.
> 
> For an organization with more lawyers than most nations, I find ICANN's
...

Apologies,

--
Shane

ATOM RSS1 RSS2