Hi all !
Is this process a good example of transparency within the ICANN ?
It's not seem to me like that. There is something to do here. It's not
clear in my humble point of view.
Cheers !
-Olevie-
2014-06-21 14:05 UTC, Magaly Pazello <[log in to unmask]>:
> Klaus,
> The all conversation was sent to this list, please see the previous since
> Singapore, including the emails you are refering, also as Sam himself
> described he was interviewed by CSG members as a possible compromise
> candidate proposed by NCSG. There is no doubt about it.
>
> Magaly
>
> On Saturday, June 21, 2014, Klaus Stoll <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> Dear Rafik
>>
>> Thank you. can you please forward us the email in which Sam was "proposed
> a compromise candidate to CSGO".
>>
>> Thank You
>>
>> Klaus
>>
>> 6/21/2014 2:31 PM, Rafik Dammak wrote:
>>
>> Hi Sam,
>> to give more detailed context :
>> we have first 3 rounds of election following an agreed process between
> Commercial Stakeholder Group (CSG) and Non-commercial Stakeholder Group
> (NCSG) , nominating 1 candidate each. but this first 3 rounds ended with
> deadlock since the winner needs to get 60% of the votes (8 among 13 votes)
> following GNSO operating rules
>> you were proposed a compromise candidate to CSG as a way to fix this
> deadlock. unfortunately, CSG didn't accept your candidature as compromise
> after you got chance to defend your case with them .
>> It cannot be a compromise if the other party rejects it. we are working
> to find a modus vivendi with CSG and get a board member who get endorsement
> from both sides of non-contracted party in GNSO (NCSG and CSG) and not lean
> toward only one side.
>> CSG just proposed their compromise candidate and we will have chance to
> interview him .
>> just as reminder the process of election is up to stakeholders group to
> decide for operating rules and there will be a election. I don't see any
> legitimacy issue here because any board member for the seat 14 has to be
> elected by 60% at the end within non-contracted party then confirmed by
> GNSO council.
>> Best,
>> Rafik
>>
>>
>> 2014-06-21 2:06 GMT+09:00 Sam Lanfranco <[log in to unmask]>:
>>>
>>> NCSG colleagues,
>>>
>>> As the currently proposed NCSG candidate for ICANN Board Seat #14 I have
> maintained a discrete silence while the process was underway. I of course
> have followed closely the events surrounding the process and its current
> stalled state. I have also responded to questions from the commercial
> stakeholders, in writing, in teleconference calls, and in meetings in
> Washington D.C., at my own expense.
>>>
>>> I have agreed to run for the seat on the simple premise that my skills
> and experience will be an asset for the tsunami of issues that will
> confront the ICANN board over the next several years, and I remain a
> candidate for Board Seat #14. The nature of some of the questions put on
> the table by the commercial stakeholders reinforced my conviction that I
> can bring a useful and constructive perspective and insights to Internet
> policy and ICANN organizational issues confronting the Board.
>>>
>>> However, this is not a campaign speech. It is an expression of concern
> about preserving the reputation of ICANN and integrity of ICANN's
> procedures around the Board Seat #14 election. There is supposed to be a
> voting procedure here. The two constituencies proposed candidates. All knew
> the likely outcome of the first rounds of votes, but procedures were
> followed, and votes were taken. Neither candidate was elected. I was
> proposed as a substitute candidate from the NCSG. At that point the
> election process stalled as various parties sought outcomes in the absence
> of the next stage in the voting process.
>>>
>>> As a candidate I of course have my hopes, but that is not the issue. If
> there is no vote at this stage, and subsequent votes if necessary, the
> integrity of ICANN's Board Seat #14 process is compromised, as is that of
> ICANN. As well, any occupant of Board Seat #14 will serve under a cloud of
> questionable legitimacy, both within the Board and beyond ICANN.
>>>
>>> Regardless of expectations about the outcome of the next round of
> voting, I urge the constituent parties to proceed according to the ICANN
> procedures set down for the process. Lastly, I remind us that the GNSO
> review is underway and that a failed process for the new Board member
> reflects poorly on all of our constituencies and points to the need to
> modify the current structure.
>>>
>>> Sam Lanfranco
>>>
>>> ----------------------------------------------
>>> Sam Lanfranco (Prof Emeritus & Senior Scholar)
>>> NPOC Member from CSIH (Canada)
>>> Econ, York U., Toronto, Ontario, CANADA - M3J 1P3
>>> email: [log in to unmask] Skype: slanfranco
>>> blog: http://samlanfranco.blogspot.com
>>> Phone: 613 476-0429 cell: 416-816-2852
>>
>>
>
> --
> Sent from my Mobile
>
--
Olévié Ayaovi Agbenyo KOUAMI
DG Ets GIDA-OKTETS
CEO de INTIC4DEV (http://www.intic4dev.org)
SG de ESTETIC (http://www.estetic.tg)
Membre de ISoc (www.isoc.org <http://www.isog.org/>) & du FOSSFA (
www.fossfa.net)
Membre de l'ICANN-NCSG/NPOC (http://www.icann.org/ et http://www.npoc.org/)
BP : 851 - Tél.: (228) 90 98 86 50 / (228) 98 43 27 72
Skype : olevie1 FB : @olivier.kouami.3 Twitter : #oleviek Lomé - Togo
|
