NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Horacio (Bombim) Cadiz" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Horacio (Bombim) Cadiz
Date:
Mon, 11 Apr 2005 10:59:48 +0800
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (19 lines)
On Sun, 10 Apr 2005, Robin Gross wrote:

> ICANN is not a "government actor" or something similar,
> which must be accountable to civil liberties, the public will have very
> little civil liberty protections online.

  But the government actor which holds a contract with ICANN could be made
accountable for the actions of its contractor, right?
  What are the implications of this ruling aside from the civil liberties
angle?

--
*****************************************************************
* Horacio T. Cadiz |Philippine Network Foundation, Inc (PHNET)  *
* ------------------------------------------------------------- *
* Free/Open Source Software. No Gates. No Windows. It is Open.  *
* No Bill. It is Free.                                          *
*****************************************************************

ATOM RSS1 RSS2