NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Robert Guerra <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Robert Guerra <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 12 May 2008 08:27:57 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (54 lines)
Good to know that my track of congressional comments related to ICANN  
and Internet Governance in general have lead to not only discussions  
on this list, but also blog posts on the IGP :)

In terms of follow-up, would it be of interest to send a response to  
the US congressional leadership before the June ICANN meeting. It  
might be strategic..


regards

Robert



On 10-May-08, at 4:49 PM, Robert Guerra wrote:

> Not sure i've seen this on any of the ICANN related lists yet..
>
>
> (US Congress) House Leaders Urge Preservation Of ICANN Role
> http://techdailydose.nationaljournal.com/2008/05/house_leaders_urge_preservatio.php
>
>
> Posted on May 6, 2008
>
> (US Congress) House Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman John
> Dingell and ranking member Joe Barton joined 14 other colleagues on
> Tuesday in sending a letter to Commerce Secretary Gutierrez praising
> the administration's continued oversight of the international entity
> charged with administering the Internet.
>
> The lawmakers also asked the Commerce Department to comment on the
> possibility of an overseas relocation of the Internet Corporation for
> Assigned Names and Numbers, which is currently based in Marina Del
> Ray, Calif. Rumors have swirled in recent years that some foreign
> government and industry stakeholders want ICANN's headquarters to move
> to Brussels.
>
> The concern comes as ICANN's leaders gradually try to transition the
> coordination of technical functions of the Web to the private sector.
> "Any change that threatens the important U.S. role in promoting U.S.
> commercial and free speech principles on the Internet can only hurt
> the consumers and businesses that count on this network every day,"
> they wrote.
>
> The letter requests a response to a handful of questions about ICANN's
> future within two weeks time. While ICANN remains the "best option for
> reaching consensus in an increasingly divided world," members said the
> organization should ensure transparency and promote greater
> accountability in its operations. ICANN constituents meet several
> times a year and their next meeting is scheduled for June 22-26 in
> Paris, France.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2