NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Horacio T. Cadiz" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Horacio T. Cadiz
Date:
Tue, 23 Sep 2003 12:41:42 +0800
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (23 lines)
On Mon, 22 Sep 2003, Barbara Simons wrote:

> It seems to me that the primary problem is that the complainant gets to
> select the arbitrator, if there is only one, or two out of the three
> arbitrators, if there are three.  This is a fundamental inequity.
> Regards,
> Barbara

  Because they can select the arbitrators, they select the
arbitrators favorable to them.  Big companies, as a matter of course, will
select the WIPO panel.  Because big companies are usually the
complainants, the WIPO panel generates a lot of business and the other
arbitrators die.  Finally, only one arbitrator will be alive. Guess who
that will be?


*************************************************************
* Horacio T. Cadiz    | Open Source. No Gates. No Windows.  *
* hcadiz AT ph.net    | It is Open. No Bill. It is Free.    *
*-----------------------------------------------------------*
*       Philippine Network Foundation, Inc (PHNET)          *
*************************************************************

ATOM RSS1 RSS2