NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 25 Oct 2012 22:19:41 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (37 lines)
Hi,

On 25 Oct 2012, at 21:43, Rafik Dammak wrote:

> @Avri thanks for your comment, can you please explain what you mean by issues of process discussion in more detail? 
> 
> 


e.g.

"
5. established clear distinctions between ‘transparency’ and ‘confidentiality
"

what are those clear distinctions?

"
8. did an in-depth review of the Statement of Interest form (SOI) to improve clarity for candidates and to enhance and enable the output of the Committee;
"

what did that review find. what is being done to improve clarity for candidates

"
reviews of the 2013 NomCom Rules and Procedures; confidentiality requirements; Code of Conduct and Conflict of Interest parameters
"

Sounds enchanting.  what did these reviews uncover.  What conclusions were reached.

What this report does is shows us the covers of the chapter headings, but not the contents.  None of this stuff concerns private data, hence it seems to be stuff that should be explained in greater detail.

So while I am grateful for the start, it is a first that should be congratulated, it is only a start.

thanks for asking

avri

ATOM RSS1 RSS2