NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 5 Feb 2013 14:40:40 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines)
Hi,

An issue I expect this group is as mixed on as anyone else.

I am among those who see no problem as I do not think it affects the code of conduct.

And we have others who see it as a great problem and who are leading the campaign against closed generics.

Might be worth having an extended NCSG-Discuss on it

avri

On 5 Feb 2013, at 13:18, William Drake wrote:

> surprise!
> 
> http://www.thedomains.com/2013/02/05/icann-new-gtld-committee-not-sure-how-to-handle-closed-generic-applications/
> 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2