Got a question for the group. Here at AK we frequently will run a carbon
or stainless steel by ICP, OES, and XRF - then compare the results from
all three instruments to each other. My silicon is pretty much always
running higher than that found by the other two methods. I'm using the
251.6 wavelength, and my background / baseline look good. My matrix
varies from nitric, perchloric, or aqua regia most often, depending on
which of the types of steel I'm doing. I always run NIST or ARMI
certified standards at the same time, and will 'correct' to these
certified materials if the results do not fall within expected limits.
(meaning if my Nickel is slightly low, I multiply results by the factor
necessary to bring it in). I wouldn't anticipate that with these acids my
torch would be dissolving into the matrix and contaminating my samples. By
the time I run my acid concentration is around 10-20%, and I'm rinsing
with water in between. I'm not sure if there's something I'm missing, but
I thought I'd poll the community for thoughts.
Likewise, my niobium is frequently low - or missing altogether. I'm
running this axially, and have just cleaned the window and aligned the
torch. None of the niobium wavelengths are finding the niobium, which was
present at about .01% in the recent round of proficiency samples.
I'd appreciate any advise / insights / etc on what I can do to improve
As always, many thanks!
Linda S. Upp
AK Steel, Middletown Research Lab
[log in to unmask]
This message is intended exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information.
If you are not the named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or disseminate this message or any part of it. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete all copies of the message.