Received: from mailbox.syr.edu [128.230.18.5]
by gwia201.syr.edu; Thu, 18 Sep 2003 17:05:15 -0400
Received: from lock-lin.gotdns.org (12-203-246-94.client.attbi.com [12.203.246.94])
by mailbox.syr.edu (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h8IL5BcJ015062
for <[log in to unmask]>; Thu, 18 Sep 2003 17:05:11 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from lock-lin.gotdns.org (lock-lin.gotdns.org [127.0.0.1])
by lock-lin.gotdns.org (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h8IL4Mj7024800
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
Thu, 18 Sep 2003 15:04:23 -0600
Received: (from neal@localhost)
by lock-lin.gotdns.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id h8IL4Dtn024795;
Thu, 18 Sep 2003 15:04:13 -0600
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2003 15:04:13 -0600
Message-Id: <[log in to unmask]>
From: Neal McBurnett <[log in to unmask]>
To: Milton Mueller <[log in to unmask]>, [log in to unmask],
Eung Hwi Chun <[log in to unmask]>,
Thierry Amoussougbo <[log in to unmask]>,
Marc Schneiders <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Outrage at verisign/network solutions over wildcards
Hi, NCUC folks. I (and the Boulder Community Network - BCN) was
active when NCDNHC was originally formed, but somehow managed
to fall out of membership, it appears. We'll get that straightened
out soon.
In the meantime, I just looked at the NCUC discussion list archives, and
don't see any discussion of what I see as a huge current issue: the
lastest abuse by Verisign (Network Solutions): using their control
over the .com and .net registries to advertise their registrar
by establishing a wild-card record for *.com and *.net.
I think NCUC should take an immediate stand against this as has
the ICANN At-Large Advisory Committee (ALAC).
I've collected (in a rather unpolished way so far...) many of
the issues at
http://bcn.boulder.co.us/~neal/ietf/verisign-abuse.html
Please lend your insight into the ICANN legalities and politics
to this discussion.
Thank you,
Neal McBurnett http://bcn.boulder.co.us/~neal/
Signed and/or sealed mail encouraged. GPG/PGP Keyid: 2C9EBA60