The report of the .net subcommittee has been reviced (slightly) on the basis of public comment. Now it up for another round of comments, and for submissions by constituencies. So what do we think? The report is not very long, esp. not if you skip the introductory part (history) and the appendix, which gives the present .net agreement. Please, send any input (or agreement) to this list ASAP. Thank you. Marc Schneiders Council rep. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2004 06:52:58 +0200 From: GNSO SECRETARIAT <[log in to unmask]> To: council <[log in to unmask]> Subject: [council] Call for Constituency submissions: dot net sub-committee Initial Report [To: liaiason6c[at]gnso.icann.org] [To: council[at]gnso.icann.org] Draft Criteria for .net Call for Constituency submissions These may be simple written expressions of support if a Constituency agrees with the content of the Initial Report of the GNSO dot net sub-committee The Initial Report of the GNSO sub-committee may be viewed here. http://www.icann.org/tlds/dotnet-reassignment/dotnet-committee-report-23jun0 4.htm Please send your submissions to: [log in to unmask] Archives may be found at: http://forum.icann.org/lists/dotnet-criteria/ by July 9, 19:00 UTC Thank you very much. Glen de Saint Géry GNSO Secretariat