Adam Peake said: >>Suggest we begin by thinking of comments we can send before Sept 13 >>on structure and methodology of the working group, and general >>composition. I don't think we must limit ourselves to what we think >>politically possible (e.g. Veni's probably correct reading of the >>way things will work out), but instead suggest what we believe is >>right, and say why. I suggest that we look at how the IFWP developed into ICANN and see how the WGIG process can be prevented from birthing another ICANN. -- Horacio T. Cadiz ******************************************** * Linux. No Windows. No Gates. It is Open. * * No Bill. It is Free. * ********************************************