Hi Milton (from Bangkok), Doesn't seem too controviersial to me :-) Best wishes, Eric > -----Original Message----- > From: Non-Commercial User Constituency > [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Milton Mueller > Sent: Friday, November 11, 2005 7:09 AM > To: [log in to unmask] > Subject: [NCUC-DISCUSS] proposed NCUC response to the > ICANN-VeriSign settlement > > Have fun with this one, folks. This should generate > discussion. If it does not, you are all dead. ;-) > 1. We would like to see the "no criticism of ICANN" > provisions stricken from the settlement agreement. > 2. We would like to see ICANN's GNSO initiate a policy > development process of the issue of registry renewal > expectancy, and produce and adopt a uniform policy that would > apply equally to all registries > 3. We would like to see a policy development process on the > issue of price caps for registries. > 4. As a general principle, we support the transfer of DNS > root zone signing authority from VeriSign to ICANN, but > believe that ICANN's legitimacy, independence and > representational structures need improvement, and hope that > ICANN and the US government will respond to appropriate > reforms coming out of the WSIS process. >