On Thu, 26 Jan 2006, Carlos Afonso wrote: > Not at all -- first of all, I never mentioned a time frame, much less a long > time. Secondly, why a working group would take forever? To the contrary, I > think a study by people who are following the issue could be done in 3-4 Then the mandate for the WG should be clear on the timeframe. Otherwise, the BC will just spin this into going forever. > What is the point in NCUC playing into the game of "yes to this domain, not > to that one", if there are just too many possibilities and criteria circling > around without any consistency? Precisely what Milton was suggesting. We point out that we really have no objections to those particular domains but the process of approval must be clarified. -- Bombim Cadiz ***************************************** * Free/Open Source Software (FOSS) -- * * No windows. No gates. It is open. * * No Bill. It is Free. * *****************************************