My conciliation proposal does not call for a freeze/moratorium, so if the phrase proposed is not included, it will not be for this reason. If the phrase I suggested (or a similar one) is to be associated with the proponent, instead of being included in the NCUC statement, then I prefer to submit my proposal through other channels, including the idea of a temporary freeze, of course. []s fraternos --c.a. Milton Mueller wrote: >I would say that strong opposition to the idea of a moratorium has been expressed, and no support expressed aside from Carlos. So my preference would be to identify that idea with its proponent, Carlos, if it is included at all. > > > >>>>Mawaki Chango <[log in to unmask]> 1/31/2006 3:30:26 PM >>> >>>> >>>> >I haven't got any new reaction on Carlos' last proposal so far - is >there any support? Thanks Carlos! Sorry I couldn't get earlier to my > >. > > >