As Carlos wrote" for the specific purpose" -do we have any kind of statement from the researchers that they will not disclose the addresses to others, etc.? We talk a lot about WHOIS and privacy protection, so I understand that Milton "does not feel comfortable." But if the purpose is clearly defined and at least some assurance given (though I think it would be very difficult to verify the use of the data - beyond getting an assurance). If you feel that there is some kind of undertaking in terms of privacy - my address representing a NCUC member can go to them. Norbert Klein Open Forum of Cambodia = Carlos Afonso wrote: > Milton, for the specific purposes mentioned, I do not see a problem. In > my view (which I recognize is of a tiny minority within NCUC) the whole > TLD system needs a complete revamping, and if there is an academic > institution (hired by ICANN or not) to provide quality analytical > feedback, we should support it. > > frt rgds > > --c.a. > > Milton Mueller wrote: > > >> I've received this. Basically they are asking for our membership list and all relevant contact details for each member organization. I do not feel comfortable releasing this information without informing everyone and letting you know what's up. Comments, please. >> >> >> > >