X-Apparently-To: [log in to unmask] via 206.190.49.196; Mon, 13 Mar 2006 15:40:24 -0800 X-YahooFilteredBulk: 192.0.35.121 X-Originating-IP: [192.0.35.121] Authentication-Results: mta163.mail.re2.yahoo.com from=melbourneit.com.au; domainkeys=neutral (no sig) Received: from 192.0.35.121 (EHLO greenriver.icann.org) (192.0.35.121) by mta163.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; Mon, 13 Mar 2006 15:40:24 -0800 Received: from greenriver.icann.org (greenriver [127.0.0.1]) by greenriver.icann.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k2DNd0AG025014; Mon, 13 Mar 2006 15:39:00 -0800 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by greenriver.icann.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id k2DNcxBm025013; Mon, 13 Mar 2006 15:38:59 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: greenriver.icann.org: majordomo set sender to [log in to unmask] using -f Received: from pechora1.icann.org (pechora1.icann.org [192.0.34.36]) by greenriver.icann.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k2DNcxjf025010 for <[log in to unmask]>; Mon, 13 Mar 2006 15:38:59 -0800 Received: from melbourneit.com.au (mail.MelbourneIT.com.au [203.31.199.194]) by pechora1.icann.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k2DNcvhG027926 for <[log in to unmask]>; Mon, 13 Mar 2006 15:39:03 -0800 Received: from balius.mit (localhost.mit [127.0.0.1]) by melbourneit.com.au (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id k2DNcwQ14660 for <[log in to unmask]>; Tue, 14 Mar 2006 10:38:58 +1100 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: [gtld-council] Draft Agenda for meetings in Wellington on Saturday 25 March and Sunday 26 March Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 10:38:55 +1100 X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Draft Agenda for meetings in Wellington on Saturday 25 March and Sunday 26 March thread-index: AcZG90cFyoWzj2QMS4Cxy+txQ2lDhQ== From: "Bruce Tonkin" <[log in to unmask]> To: <[log in to unmask]> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by greenriver.icann.org id k2DNcxjf025011 Sender: [log in to unmask] Precedence: discussion Content-Length: 1399 Hello All, As discussed in our last call, the aim for Saturday and Sunday is to progress the work on new gTLDs. In our meeting in Washington, we covered the issue of whether to have new gTLDs, and we had a brainstorming session where each member of the committee identified the selection criteria. The aim for the meeting in Wellington will be to attempt to converge on a set of agreed selection criteria, and begin the discussion on allocation methods. Saturday 25 March 2006 ====================== (1) 9:00 - 9:30 am - Review ICANN mission and core values [From ICANN bylaws: Any ICANN body making a recommendation or decision shall exercise its judgment to determine which core values are most relevant and how they apply to the specific circumstances of the case at hand, and to determine, if necessary, an appropriate and defensible balance among competing values.] The intent is to set the scene for the subsequent discussions. (2) 10:00 am - 10:30am - Review list of selection criteria proposed by Committee members in Washington (3) 10:30am to 12:30pm - rank the selection criteria based on level of support for each criteria from the whole committee, and the degree to which the criteria is consistent with the ICANN mission and core values (4) 12:30pm - 1:30pm lunchbreak (5) 1:30pm - 3:30pm - Discuss criteria in more detail that have the support of at least 3 constituencies, in order of those that have the most support (6) 3:30pm to 4:00pm - Afternoon tea break (7) 4pm to 6pm - Discuss any criteria that don't yet have broad support - this is a further opportunity to convince the rest of the Committee that a particular criteria is needed and consensus support from the GNSO constituencies Sunday 26 March 2006 ==================== (1) 9am to 10:30am Allocation methods - review constituency statements with respect to allocation methods, and with respect to the ICANN mission and core values - review information from submitted papers plus public comments relevant to this question - identify possible allocation methods (2) 10:30am - 11am Break (3) 11am to 1pm - Meeting between the GNSO Committee on new gTLDs and the GAC working group on gTLDs (I assume this is over lunch) - GNSO Committee to review progress to date, and identify progress with respect to the PDP process - GAC working group to discuss progress to date on public policy principles that may apply to the issue of new gTLDs - bearing in mind ICANN's mission and core values (4) 1pm to 1:30pm - break (5) 1:30pm to 2:30pm - - rank the allocation methods based on level of support for each method from the whole committee, and the degree to which the method is consistent with the ICANN mission and core values (6) 2:30pm to 3:30pm - Discuss methods in more detail that have the support of at least 3 constituencies, in order of those that have the most support. (7) 3:30pm to 4pm - break (8) 4pm to 6pm - Discuss any methods that don't yet have broad support - this is a further opportunity to convince the rest of the Committee that a particular method is needed and consensus support from the GNSO constituencies (Alternative 8) - if we are able to cover allocation methods in less time than allocated above, we can start the discussion on contractual conditions at this point. Regards, Bruce Tonkin