Thanks, Danny, I appreciate especially the two paragraphs of your mail which I leave here. Norbert Klein = Danny Younger wrote: > Having read the PIR proposal as put forward to Tina > Dam, I have a number of preliminary concerns: > > > 3. This proposal was tendered over three months ago > (15 May 2006) and ICANN has yet to provide an initial > response to the proposal. It would be nice to know > why there has been such a delay, why ICANN failed to > post this proposal in their Correspondence section of > the website, and why this proposal was not mentioned > at all at the Marrakech Domain Name Marketplace > Workshop in which PIR's David Maher was a panelist. > It would also be nice to know why the language of this > proposal was not included in the 27 June 2006 proposed > .org registry agreement and is only now being brought > to the attention of the NCUC. > > 4. Establishing a policy to deal with the 5 day Add > Grace period is rightfully the province of the GNSO > whose PDP on Contractual Conditions could readily deal > with this issue. We should not be acting to support a > registry initiative to the detriment of ICANN's > policy-recommending body. >