hi danny >Those of us that have actually participated in the >GNSO PDP process sadly understand that this template >has been overtaken by events and is widely disregarded >by those that are active in the policy development >process. ah.. well, could those of you who have actually participated in the GNSO PDP process point those of us who haven't, to correct information? or, is the process such that it defies such documentation? (the rest of your message seems to indicate so..) mawaki's earlier message called for additional support, if i remember correctly, and i for one would like to if possible - but as we're all very busy, it's important to have a clear understanding of what resources we'd be expected to commit, over what period of time.. even if only a rough approximation making all of these processes more transparent (and documenting them is one way) would do much to encourage folk to get (more) nvolved karen