for your comment, please read. --- Denise Michel <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 11:32:13 +0100 > From: Denise Michel <[log in to unmask]> > To: GNSO Council <[log in to unmask]> > Subject: [Fwd: [council] Summary of LSE constituency input] > > Following-up on Bruce's request -- would you please send your > constituency's edits to the attached chart to the GNSO Secretariat > <[log in to unmask]> by Friday, 2 March. Please let > Glen > know if you need more time. > > Again, this chart will be used to inform the Board Governance > Committee > and will help form a basis for selecting a few recommendations > relating > to major structural issues for public discussion in Lisbon. We are > > scheduling a public forum on Monday in Lisbon to discuss GNSO > Improvements. > > Thanks. > Denise > > Denise Michel > Vice President, Policy Development > ICANN www.icann.org > [log in to unmask] > > > -------- Original Message -------- > > > Hello All, > > I asked the staff to summarise the views of each of the > constituencies > on the LSE report. > > Each recommendation is ranked in terms of level of support for the > recommendation, and priority for implementing the recommendation. > > The rankings are high, medium, low. > > This draft table has been prepared based on the inputs to the > public > forum. > > The recommendations have also been broken into the following > categories: > > - participation > > - rules > > - structure > > - tools-support > > - working procedures > > Please review and advise ICANN staff of any corrections. > > The purpose of this document will be to help inform the Board > Governance > Committee and also form a basis for selecting a few recommendations > (such as recommendation 19) for public discussion in Lisbon. The > aim > is to focus discuss on major structural issues in Lisbon, rather > than > debate whether the website could be better. > > Regards, > Bruce Tonkin > > > > > >