All, I wanted to confirm that our NCUC comments on the .TEL proposal were timely submitted. If you would like to see the comments, as well as a terrific response to the Business Constituency, International Trademark Association and IP Constituencies objections by the head of TELNIC, the comments are posted at: _http://forum.icann.org/lists/telnic-whois-proposal/_ (http://forum.icann.org/lists/telnic-whois-proposal/) Best, Kathy p.s. I changed "Catch-22" to "no-win" <<Milton L Mueller wrote: Thanks so much, Kathy! Does anyone object to putting in these comments on behalf of NCUC? Thanks, Kathy, I fully support the intent, but I have one small reservation on the text: I do not understand "catch22" and I would appreciate to replace it with simple, generally understandable language - understandable also by those who are weak in the English language. Norbert ____________________________________ From: Non-Commercial User Constituency [_mailto:[log in to unmask] (mailto:[log in to unmask]) ] On Behalf Of [log in to unmask] (mailto:[log in to unmask]) Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2007 11:31 PM To: [log in to unmask] (mailto:[log in to unmask]) Subject: [NCUC-DISCUSS] Draft comments to support .TEL's Whois proposal - due 6/28 [snip] -- If you want to know what is going on in Cambodia, please visit us regularly - you can find something new every day: _http://cambodiamirror.wordpress.com_ (http://cambodiamirror.wordpress.com/) ************************************** See what's free at http://www.aol.com.